Which brands need 2D barcodes first
Updated July 2026
Not every brand needs to act at the same speed. Sequencing by actual pressure, rather than by deadline anxiety, saves
money.
Move now
- Fresh and short-shelf-life food. Expiry and lot data in the code drives markdown automation and
waste reduction — the clearest operational return available today, and independent of any deadline.
- Anything covered by FSMA 204. Enforcement lands July 20, 2028. Lot-level traceability data has to
exist and be retrievable; building it into the code now avoids doing the work twice.
- EU-facing textiles, footwear, furniture, tyres. The Digital Product Passport regime is arriving,
with textile rules expected in 2027 and application following. Products designed now will still be selling then.
- Brands whose retailers have already published 2D requirements. A retailer's supplier requirement is
enforceable in a way an industry target is not.
Plan, but don't rush
- Shelf-stable grocery and household goods. Real pressure, long runway. Fold the change into your next
scheduled artwork revision.
- Health and beauty. Consumer interest in ingredient transparency makes the consumer-page side of this
worth doing well rather than fast.
Watch and wait
- Products that never cross a retail POS — food service, B2B industrial supply, direct-to-consumer only.
The POS argument does not apply. Traceability may still, on its own merits.
- Very small or awkward packages. Where the minimum symbol size genuinely does not fit, wait for
guidance rather than printing something that will not scan.
The one thing everyone should do now
Clean your GTIN data. It costs nothing, it is a prerequisite for every path above, and it is the step that reliably
turns out to be worse than expected once someone actually checks.
Check your own catalog
Free automated audit — invalid GTINs, duplicates, and whether your URLs resolve. No account needed.
Run the free audit